Technological innovation is visible in our children, who spend all day staring at screens, and it’s embedded in our stock market, where Apple, Alphabet, Google and Meta compete for the highest valuation of any company on this planet.
These days, when we think of technology, do we seriously think and debate about improved manufacturing, robotic surgeries, vertical farming, sustainable manufacturing and use? Or are we focused more on smartphones, smart devices, gaming, metaverse and AI.
It appears that thanks to the stock markets, the global definition of technology has narrowed.
There is just no way that the importance of smartphones, devices and social networks can be diluted, and this article in no way undermines the huge contribution that these have made to our society. However, global productivity figures seem to indicate that, over the past several years, the majority of the world seems to be living in an era of technological stagnation.
Everybody knows that technological innovation is reshaping the world faster than ever before. The proof is in our pockets, which now contain a tiny devices that can access huge amounts of data and information. Technological innovation is visible in our children, who spend all day staring at screens, and it’s embedded in our stock market, where Apple, Alphabet, Google and Meta compete for the highest valuation of any company on this planet.
Why then is it that productivity experts have a different story to tell?
It is a fact that in recent years, our lives have been improved in a hundred different ways – take GPS, digital photos, OTT and almost zero-cost communication, for instance. Is it because, the way GDP is currently calculated, it is good at catching value to businesses but not good at catching value to individuals?
For example, When GPS technology was adopted by delivery and logistics companies, productivity in that sector went up in geometric progression. But google maps are provided free to mobile users. So it’s reasonable to believe that household productivity has also gone up. But that’s not really measured in productivity statistics in the manner in which it needs to be done.
The most relevant explanation could be that technology is most certainly changing how many of us play and relax more than it’s changing how we work and produce. Digital technology has transformed a handful of industries in the media and entertainment space that unfortunately occupy a mindshare that is hugely out of proportion to the overall economic importance of these segments from a global productivity point of view. So, is the perception of being better connected via social media and OTT lulling us into a belief that technology has improved our existence?
We use computers and various devices in all jobs, and that is a real change.
When electricity made it possible to create light with the flick of a switch instead of the strike of a match, the process of creating light was changed forever. When the electric elevator allowed buildings to extend vertically instead of horizontally, the very nature of land use was changed, and urban density was created. And so it was with motor vehicles replacing horses as the primary form of transportation. And air transportation makes the world a global village.
Then, of course, there were the medical advances in the 18th and 19th centuries: sanitation, anesthetic, antibiotics, surgery, chemotherapy, antidepressants. Nothing improves a person’s economic productivity better than remaining alive and healthy.
However, if we look to the present, the global economy is facing major headwinds in the coming years that range from an aging workforce to excessive regulations to very high inequality. Technological innovations will have to overcome all of these, besides just steady GDP growth.
The hugely positive part of technology is that a lot of work is being done in machine learning, gene editing, antibody design, driverless cars, material sciences, robotic surgery, artificial intelligence, and more. This kind of detailed, high-investment work takes time to turn into new products, usable medical treatments, and innovative startups. As an eternal optimist, I am certain we will get to see the dramatic effects of these technologies over the next 10-15 years.
The disruptive part of technology is that companies will use their superior productivity to destroy their competitors, revolutionise industries, and push the economy forward. See what Amazon has done to the retail sector. See what Uber has done to the taxi cab industry.
What is really holding back the global economy isn’t so much a shortage of technological advances but the wrong uses for which some of them are being put to.
Most global organisations genuinely believe that if they have installed advanced technology, they should be doing a better job. But, in effect, the hardest thing in most companies is not about building the technology stack, but getting people to make strategic use of it, and make better future road maps.
We have gotten used to a TV anchor saying “technology stocks are down today,” and we all know which half a dozen stocks are being talked about.
The real answer to the query of whether technology is seriously improving productivity or just providing lifestyle experiences lies in the fact that there are many areas of our existence where technology is being used to research better ways to exist in the future, ways to create a better and more sustainable planet, to seriously improve human longevity and productivity, to provide education in innovative ways. These areas, these organisations are not so much the focus of media attention.
The majority of media attention is given to technology which has been defined as ‘that which is changing fast’.
Featured in: BWMarketing